9 thoughts on “Agreeing with Pielke, Sr”

  1. That’s because they’ve got a *serious* desertification problem. And of course, in a country with a population that size, lots of people have to be kept busy doing useless things. But the main thing is that the central government needs to be able to pretend they’ve got a plan other than abandonment.

    Like

  2. > see RPjr

    Yeah, that’s a meta-concern meta-troll thread developing there. Amazing.

    There ought to be an academic field interested in the study of how this stuff happens and how people pile into it.

    Like

  3. This is so fascinating because I am both (physical scientist, biologist/social scientist, anthropologist) but to make money must lean more on the phy. science side and like to vent in these climate forums.
    This parallels so closely real issues I have with conservation biology (of which I have my own “auditing” background).
    I have met RPjr and think he understands the key realities of policy implementation as perhaps only a social scientist can, which is superior or more realistic in my view than most physical scientists.
    “there ought to be an acedemic field . . .” careful what you wish for, Hank.

    . . .and WC – the inline response from a while ago about your snark being on hair-trigger – very, very, very, very funny!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s